Date |
Presenters |
Title |
April 11, 2025 |
Tunde Ogunfowora |
Is my leader gaslighting me? Uncovering the Nomological Network of Gaslighting in leader-employee relationships |
Abstract: The term gaslighting has become widely used to describe deliberate attempts to undermine a person’s sense of reality. Although predominantly studied in romantic relationships, research suggests that gaslighting can occur in any context where power imbalance exists. In this research, we investigate the nature of gaslighting within leader-employee relationships. We propose a conceptual model that differentiates between leader gaslighting tactics and employee experienced gaslighting – the psychological experience of being gaslit – , and subsequent downstream effects on a host of employee outcomes. We also explore the possibility that these relationships are conditional on the magnitude of social (versus formal) power imbalance between the employee and leader. We began by developing measures of leader gaslighting and employee experienced gaslighting and established strong psychometric, factorial, and construct validity evidence across three studies (Studies 1a-c). Next, we tested our conceptual model in two large-scale, time-lagged studies and find support for many of our predictions. The findings inform our understanding of the adverse effects of leader gaslighting on employee self-focused (organizational-based self-esteem and turnover intentions), performance-focused (task performance and workplace deviance), and leader-focused (impression management and affective commitment) outcomes. We further identify the power-based qualities of employees who are able to mitigate (although not completely eliminate) these deleterious effects. |
Date |
Presenters |
Title |
March 14, 2025 |
Maureen Bourassa | Health Data Privacy and Consumer Norm Concessions |
Abstract: When we buy things or provide information online, we often expect that businesses behave and respond as we do. For example, we expect that businesses follow ethical principles such as equity, fairness, honesty, respect, and trust. Researchers of this study wanted to understand people’s expectation about how such principles guide behavior in digital spaces. So they interviewed people and asked them about these ethical principles – which they call reciprocity norms – when they read privacy policies and breach notifications. The interviewees felt they do not have any real choice in their privacy decisions: because people need access to many of these online services, they simply surrender their privacy and lower their expectations about how they will be treated. People coped with this lack of choice by rationalizing their decisions and adopting a half-hearted approach to their online interactions. Ultimately, the researchers found that people want real choices in privacy policies and breach notifications, and to be recognized as individuals. The researchers describe this desire as tiered transparency—that different people want different types of information about privacy and may want it communicated in different ways. The key for businesses is meeting people where they are and giving them privacy information that they can truly understand to empower informed decision-making in digital spaces. |
Date |
Presenters |
Title |
January 17, 2025 |
Dionne Pohler | The impact of COVID-19 workplace vaccine mandates on employment outcomes in the U.S. and Canada |
Abstract: COVID-19 vaccine workplace mandates in the U.S. and Canada were unprecedented in scope. An analysis of the impact of mandates on employment and economic losses, as well as social outcomes, is critical since any potential benefits of mandates must be met with a robust evaluation of the associated harms of these policies. This presentation will focus on two national studies we undertook that reveal how mandates impacted employment in the U.S. and Canada, and how this burden fell disproportionately across demographic groups, raising equity concerns. Research currently provides evidence for the benefits of proof-of-vaccination requirements, including through the value of lives saved, but our research reveals substantial economic and social costs. |
Date |
Presenters |
Title |
December 13, 2024 |
Mohsen Akbari, Marie Racine, and George Tannous | Institutional Ownership in Family-Controlled Corporations |
Abstract: Approximately one third of the fortune 500 companies in the United States (US) are considered family-controlled corporations. These companies account for a significant portion of outstanding equity and a large proportion of them are market leaders in their industries and their securities are publicly traded in high volume. Institutional investors, such as pension plans and hedge, mutual, and exchange traded funds, are major contributors of capital in the US. Institutions that hold more than $100 million US dollars in funds have control over the US equity capital market and this control is growing over time in both large and small corporations. Fernando et al (2014) report that institutional holdings of common shares in family corporations are less than institutional holdings in nonfamily corporations. They argue that institutions may be concerned that the controlling family may extract private benefits at the expense of minority shareholders (Type 2 agency problem). This result contradicts prior studies which suggest that family corporations are run more efficiently and perform better than nonfamily corporations. In this study, we find that institutional ownership as a percentage of total outstanding shares is less in family corporations than in nonfamily corporations. However, institutions control a higher percentage of the shares held outside the ownership of the controlling family. This finding suggests that the lower reported level of institutional ownership in family corporations is the result of a crowding out effect and it is not an indication of concerns over family control. On the contrary, it seems that institutional investors are more willing to endure lack of control, amd lower market liquidity for the sake of investing in family-controlled corporations. |
Date |
Presenters |
Title |
November 15, 2024 |
Marjorie Delbaere and Ann Liang | AI Unleashed: Ethical Adventures in Research and Publishing |
Abstract: Curious about how AI is impacting research? Ann Liang, Assistant Librarian at the University of Saskatchewan, will help us dive into the must-know issues related to AI in research, ethics, copyright, and what publishers expect when it comes to citing and using AI tools. Once we have set the stage, Marjorie Delbaere, Acting Dean, will facilitate a conversation about what this all means within the context of Edwards School of Business. We hope to spend time in discussion about the practical applications of generative AI tools and how to harness technology in research practice and administration. |
Date |
Presenters |
Title |
October 18, 2024 |
Richard Metters | Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: The Role of Gender in Supply Chain Management |
Abstract: Across the globe a considerable number of jobs are "gendered." That is, the work is considered appropriate for only one gender by the indigenous culture. This seminar is mostly concerned with work that is considered appropriate only for women. The focus is on the operational issues that accrue due to the combination of what is deemed appropriate treatment to, and activities of, women. Global differences in business location, layout, the implementation of quality management programs, shift scheduling, operational compliance, the strategic capability of volume flexibility, and other issues are explored. These issues are especially salient for global corporations extending operations overseas utilizing expatriates management. |
Date |
Presenters |
Title |
September 20, 2024 |
Research Data Management Workshop | |
Abstract: The Research Committee is pleased to invite you to our upcoming Edwards Research Seminar Series presentation with Dr. Luke Heidebrecht, Research Facilitator at Edwards School of Business. He will be presenting on Research Data Management Practices, which will include discussions about research data organization, storage, and preservation practices as well as an introduction to a resource he has been working on to facilitate the development of Data Management Plans (DMP) for grant applications. |